It looks pretty nice, and the markup is not bad either, though if you run it through a validator it will find a few things.
I notice you have an IE hack in your CSS
Code:
* html body {
font-size: x-small;
f\ont size: xx-small;
}
I think it should be
Code:
* html body {
font-size: x-small;
f\ont-size: xx-small;
}
Looking at the home page... One of the key things I have learnt with design is to get the site's aim across really clearly right away. You have a nice explanation on there but its all in a dense paragraph of small type. I'd break that up a bit, get some emphasis on certain words to make it more promenant and readable.
I know the site gracefully falls back if javascript is dissabled allowing you to still navigate to the submenu options, however you can do a menu system like that purely with css, which is the method I personally prefer.
If I was really trying to be picky I'd say that although image alt attributes are great, I would always go by two rules with them. 1) You make them describe the actual image, as that's what they are meant to do, or. 2)If they have no useful relevance to the content then use alt="".
For those people with screenreaders mainly, adding a 'skip to content' anchor link above the menu system in the source, even if it is hidden by the css, is good practice. You could equally add 'to the top' and stuff too.
Erm, okay I'm starting to go on now aren't I. You could put some access keys in for key menu items. And I'd love to see some helpful title tooltips on links.
I'm done now
Bookmarks